Discussion:
Donald Trump's 2020 election loss was an inside job
(too old to reply)
Leroy N. Soetoro
2023-07-20 21:48:06 UTC
Permalink
https://nypost.com/2023/06/24/donald-trumps-2020-election-loss-was-an-
inside-job/

Score half a point for Donald Trump.

It turns out he was on to something with his claim the 2020 election was
rigged, though not in the way he thinks.

The dirty deed didn’t happen in offices in Arizona or Georgia, where
Republicans supposedly were banished while Democrats counted duffel bags
full of late-arriving votes.

Nor did Trump lose because computers were wired to rob him of victory.

Instead, the cheating that likely denied Trump a second term was very
close to home.

In fact, it was an inside job.

There are numerous bombshells in the congressional testimony of two IRS
whistleblowers, but the most significant is that members of Trump’s
Department of Justice helped to tip the 2020 election to his opponent by
slow-walking the investigation into Hunter Biden.

The interference with the probe began as soon as it looked like Joe Biden
was going to win the Democrats’ nomination.

That’s the allegation made by supervising agent Gary Shapley, who detailed
steps he and other IRS investigators wanted to take to gather evidence
against Hunter for massive tax fraud and other crimes.

They planned to execute search warrants in New York, California, Arkansas
and Washington, DC.

They also wanted to search Joe Biden’s Delaware guest house because Hunter
spent a lot of time there.

The probers laid out their plan in a probable cause memo, but it was
inexplicably rejected by DOJ lawyers.

“After former Vice President Joseph Biden became the presumptive
Democratic nominee for president in early April 2020, career DOJ officials
dragged their feet on the IRS taking these investigative steps,” Shapley
testified.

“By June 2020, those same career officials were already delaying overt
investigative actions.”

Noting that the rejections came long before the probes ran afoul of the
Justice Department’s rule to “stand down” on political cases within 60 or
90 days of an election, Shapley said bluntly: “It was apparent that DOJ
was purposely slow-walking investigative actions in this matter.”

So the fix — for both the case and the election — was in from the start.

The testimony is pure dynamite, with Shapley and the other agent, who is
unidentified, documenting numerous instances where either career officials
or, later, Joe Biden appointees, stepped in to thwart the investigation.

They claim DOJ lawyers tipped off Hunter’s lawyers about a plan to conduct
surprise interviews, and disclosed the plan to search a storage locker,
giving Biden’s team time to remove any incriminating evidence.

Shapley, who led a team of 12 IRS agents, said that unlike usual
practices, Justice lawyers selected which witnesses could be interviewed.

His team was blocked from seeing Hunter Biden’s laptop, even though the
FBI had authenticated it in 2019.

The big setup
“Investigators assigned to this investigation were obstructed from seeing
all the available evidence,” he testified, calling the move
“unprecedented.”

He also said they were instructed “to not look into anything related to
President Biden.”

An example of their suspicions of wider crimes includes the infamous July
30, 2017, WhatsApp message from Hunter Biden to Chinese businessman Henry
Zhao, where Hunter wrote: “I am sitting here with my father and we would
like to understand why the commitment made has not been fulfilled.”

He threatened that if he didn’t get a call or text from the right people,
“I will make certain that between the man sitting next to me and every
person he knows and my ability to forever hold a grudge that you will
regret not following my direction.”

As The Post reported, Senate officials in 2020 found that Hunter Biden’s
checking accounts received wires totaling $5.1 million from China in
subsequent days.

Did the “big guy” get his cut?

Only a fool would believe it’s a coincidence Justice settled the Hunter
case on see-no-evil terms two days before the testimony became public.

Clearly, Attorney General Merrick Garland and his corrupt aides wanted to
head off public outrage by saying the case was over.

But Garland is in a double bind, because Shapley testified that Garland
lied to the Senate when he said Delaware US Attorney David Weiss had the
authority to bring whatever charges in any district he wanted.

Shapley said Weiss was in fact prevented by Biden appointees from bringing
charges in DC and California.

Garland, in an echo of Dr. Anthony Fauci’s ridiculous claim that “I am
science,” declared his innocence and added that allegations of corruption
against Justice were dangerous because they “constitute an attack on an
institution that is essential to American democracy and essential to the
safety of the American people.”

Sounds like he’s feeling the heat.

The IRS testimony also casts a shadow on Bill Barr’s two-year tenure as
Trump’s AG.

Barr did courageous work in flagging the misconduct of former FBI Director
James Comey and others for spying on Trump’s 2016 campaign and in
eviscerating the media’s role, too.

Barr’s double role
Barr tasked John Durham with getting to the bottom of the 2016 scandal,
and Durham concluded the FBI never had enough evidence to open the Trump
probe.

Yet Barr did not pay sufficient attention to what was happening under his
nose in the 2020 campaign.

He certainly knew of the Hunter Biden probe, but, to judge from results,
never realized corrupt DOJ officials were again abusing their power to rig
the outcome of a second presidential election.

Indeed, the effort to help Joe Biden wasn’t limited to restricting the
probe of his son.

FBI agents instructed Twitter, Facebook and other tech giants to block The
Post’s first laptop stories, which showed Joe Biden meeting with Hunter’s
partners and paymasters.

The agents adopted the “Russian disinformation” ruse the Biden campaign
and 51 former intelligence officials also used.

How much coordination there was in those two plots remains unknown.

Unfortunately for America, the effort succeeded.

Polls taken after the election showed enough Biden voters to change the
outcome would not have voted for him if they had known about The Post’s
reports.

The IRS testimony feels like a potential turning point, but House
Republicans must resist the temptation to rush toward impeachment of
Garland and the president. Release of the transcripts came during a crush
of big news, such as the loss of five people in the Titan disaster and the
move to oust Vladimir Putin by Russia’s mercenary leader.

As legendary GOP strategist Ed Rollins notes, the political class,
including the media, assume every voter is a news junkie.

Rollins cautions it can take two weeks for even big news to get the full
attention of most people.

That means Rep. James Comer of Kentucky and other investigative leaders
must keep putting key witnesses under oath, especially Hunter Biden
partners Devon Archer and Rob Walker.

Brick by brick, they must build a case that even honest Democrats and
their media handmaidens can’t deny.

Only then should the GOP move to the end game.
--
We live in a time where intelligent people are being silenced so that
stupid people won't be offended.

Durham Report: The FBI has an integrity problem. It has none.

No collusion - Special Counsel Robert Swan Mueller III, March 2019.
Officially made Nancy Pelosi a two-time impeachment loser.

Thank you for cleaning up the disaster of the 2008-2017 Obama / Biden
fiasco, President Trump.

Under Barack Obama's leadership, the United States of America became the
The World According To Garp. Obama sold out heterosexuals for Hollywood
queer liberal democrat donors.

President Trump boosted the economy, reduced illegal invasions, appointed
dozens of judges and three SCOTUS justices.
45out
2023-07-21 00:08:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://nypost.com/2023/06/24/donald-trumps-2020-election-loss-was-an-
inside-job/
Stupid Trump was easily outwitted by President Biden. Trump is of low
intelligence.

Looming indictment wrenches open the central question of 2024: Is Trump
fit to serve?

Privately, the fear is that a third indictment, even if it’s the most
serious one yet, will once again help Trump.
Donald Trump stands at a podium on stage as a red light flashes across his
face.

Early responses suggest the GOP field remains uncomfortable going after
Donald Trump directly over Jan. 6, but, instead, would attack him around
the edges. | Giorgio Viera/AFP/Getty Images

By Adam Wren and Natalie Allison

07/18/2023 07:36 PM EDT

Updated: 07/18/2023 09:21 PM EDT

Donald Trump’s announcement on Tuesday that he expects to soon be a
thrice-indicted candidate is forcing GOP candidates to fully contend with
the fundamental question of the 2024 presidential primary.

Is the former president fit to reoccupy the office?

The early responses suggest the field remains uncomfortable going after
Trump directly over Jan. 6, but, instead, would attack him around the
edges.

In South Carolina, Ron DeSantis said Trump “should have come out more
forcefully” as rioters ransacked the Capitol, but added that it fell short
of criminal activity. Vivek Ramaswamy told POLITICO in a statement he
“would have made very different judgments than President Trump did” on
Jan. 6. And Nikki Haley said the rest of the primary is threatening to be
drowned out by Trump’s legal “drama.”
DeSantis says Trump 'didn't do anything' to stop Jan. 6

The answers represented at least a small crack in the deference that some
previously courteous candidates had shown to Trump following his earlier
two indictments. But only a small one. And privately, the campaigns were
skeptical that even those modest attacks would have any impact other than
benefiting Trump himself.

“Jan. 6 just gins up the base,” said a strategist working for a Trump
rival.

Critics of the former president were left to wonder what it would take for
the field to actually turn on him over Jan. 6, if a “target letter”
informing Trump he was about to be indicted for his behavior around that
day didn’t do the trick.

“This is the kabuki dance they’re going to be doing for months — it ain’t
going to be the first time and it ain’t going to be the last time,” said
Mike Madrid, the Republican strategist and co-founder of the anti-Trump
Lincoln Project. “The kabuki dance is trying to have it both ways while
they try to wait for dust to settle on his legal problems.”

Nearly a month before the first debate, the actions of Special Counsel
Jack Smith’s grand jury has candidates hurtling toward a Rubicon they’ve
not fully found a way to navigate: To assail Trump’s character as
exhibited in the lead up to and on Jan. 6 or not.

Trump’s former vice president, Mike Pence, dealt with the matter head on
in his announcement speech last month in Iowa, saying Trump “demanded”
that he “choose between him and our Constitution,” and adding that “anyone
who asked someone else to put them over the Constitution should never be
president of the United States again.”

And former Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson went further than his past remarks
about Trump’s first and second indictments, declining to pad his
statements with references to “presumption of innocence” and the need to
“wait on the facts.”

“While Donald Trump would like the American people to believe that he is
the victim in this situation,” Hutchinson said in a written statement,
“the truth is that the real victims of January 6th were our democracy, our
rule of law, and those Capitol Police officers who worked valiantly to
protect our Capitol.”

Chris Christie, the former New Jersey governor, slammed Trump as well,
saying his “conduct on January 6th proves he doesn’t care about our
country & our Constitution,” regardless of what the latest case shows.
Christie bashes Trump: CNN town hall moments

But aside from that trio, the rest of the field is landing in a proverbial
no-man’s land on the question of Trump’s conduct on Jan. 6. Their
reticence underscores how hard they continue to believe it is to hit Trump
without looking squishy to the base.

DeSantis experienced that firsthand. Following his gentle criticism that
Trump “should have come out more forcefully” on Jan. 6, the Florida
governor was saddled by longtime Trump adviser Jason Miller with a new
derisive moniker: “Ron DeCheney,” a reference to former Rep. Liz Cheney,
the Republican vilified by the rank-and-file after co-leading the Jan. 6
committee.


Republican operatives have internalized the idea that to question Trump’s
innocence related to Jan. 6 is to invite the wrath of his base. And though
the expected indictment’s focus on Trump’s actions surrounding Jan. 6
would appear to give them ground to stand on, it’s unclear that line of
attack is swaying primary voters.

“If you’re looking for an anti-Trump lane, it’s a fool’s errand,” said
Madrid. “You’re looking for the fountain of youth. It doesn’t exist. What
you may be trying to do is hoping that you can occupy a lane that opens up
if he is put on trial and thrown in jail before the election.”

Republican consultants working to support Trump’s primary rivals didn’t
immediately see Tuesday’s news as a defining moment in the race. The
previous indictments already boosted Trump’s fundraising and rallied GOP
voters to his side.

“It seems like each indictment has only gotten him more support,” said a
senior adviser to a rival campaign who was granted anonymity to discuss
campaign dynamics.

The adviser added that this likely forthcoming indictment is far more
serious than the first two. But absent further details from Smith himself,
it’s unclear what the political fallout would be.

“If it looks more like New York, then he will get a bump out of it,” said
another GOP consultant granted anonymity to discuss the dynamics of the
race, in reference to the indictment over alleged hush money payments to a
porn actress. “But if [the DOJ] handles it like the other indictment in a
professional way and they have a lot of backup, I think he is likely to
suffer — but not a ton of damage.”
Support
2023-07-21 00:39:06 UTC
Permalink
In article <***@0.0.0.1>

#loser45

Loading...